🔗 Share this article Boom Time for US Billionaires: Why the Economic Structure Sustains Income Disparity To numerous Americans, the economy over the past five years has been difficult. Prices have skyrocketed while wages remains unchanged. Steep mortgage rates have made buying a home a dismal prospect. The unemployment rate has been creeping up. Most people have reported they're putting off major life decisions, including starting a family or changing careers, because of the instability. But for a select few of people, the recent half-decade couldn't have been more prosperous. The Billionaire Boom The assets of the world's billionaires grew 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even throughout all the economic instability, the stock market has only continued to grow. This expansion has largely benefited just a limited group of Americans: 10% of the population owns 93% of stock market wealth. As uneven as this allocation seems, it's the financial structure working as it is existing today. "Affluent individuals have acquired their jets, they've acquired their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're securing senators and media outlets," explained inequality researcher Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are exploiting the system of inequality." Understanding Wealth Tiers To help others grasp what exactly it means to be "wealthy" in the US, Collins utilizes a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, imagined the different levels of wealth as "Affluencia" villages: Prosperity Village, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville. To modernize the concept, Collins organizes these "economic communities" based on income levels: At the base level, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a annual salary of at least $110,000 and an net worth of over $1.5m. The villages get more restricted as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m. Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m. Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth. Collectively, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically. "You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still sitting in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins noted. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're flying in a private jet. That's a really separate reality. You fly private, you have no interest in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system shuts down – you're set." The Billionaireville Effect The highest hill in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's wealthiest. The power that this group has substantially outweighs those who are simply wealthy, let alone the ordinary person who doesn't inhabit "Richistan" at all. But Collins thinks the progressive slogan "abolish billionaires" doesn't capture the real problem and has a "suggestion of eradication" to it. "It's the distinction between individual behaviors and a framework of policies," Collins said. "We should be focused on an economic system that channels so much wealth upward to the billionaires." Fortune Building Strategies To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins breaks it down into four parts: accumulating assets, defending the wealth, political capture and maximum resource extraction. When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think only about the first step, Collins said. People can create a reasonable quantity of wealth through establishing or managing a successful business, which could get them admission in Affluent Town. But getting to Billionaireville requires significant resources and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their skills to ensure that the super rich are being calculated about their taxes. "Wealth defense professionals use a wide variety of tools such as legal entities, foreign deposits, undisclosed businesses, philanthropic entities and other mechanisms to hold assets," he writes. Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs political support. Wealth of over $40m converts to political power, Collins says, and can be used to defend wealth and maintain expansion. The ultimate step is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "hyper extraction" to describe how the wealthy have come to affect nearly every single part of an Americans' routine activities largely through capital management, which allows wealthy individuals to support private companies. "Private equity is looking for those corners of the economy where they can increase profits a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people realize is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is parked in so few hands, and they can kind of turn around and say, 'Where else can we generate returns out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs." Tangible Effects The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people facing higher costs for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any meaningful wage increases. And Collins said the pain and frustration of this kind of society can lead to serious unrest. "The most powerful affluent rulers understand people are being left behind [and] are financially struggling," Collins said, adding that right-leaning leaders have been good at accessing a potent "phony populism". Policy Situation The irony, Collins points out in his book, is that elected representatives have appointed a series of billionaires to government roles. Along with affluent innovators who had temporary but significant roles overseeing substantial reductions to the federal workforce, other important roles for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires. This government structure, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make lasting reductions for the wealthy and corporations. The Path Forward While political parties continue to argue that immigration and bad trade agreements are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the question becomes: Will the other major party, which has also been influenced by the billionaires and big money, be able to meaningfully address the underlying harms?" Collins said. Progressive politicians, he argues, know what policies are needed to "change wealth distribution", including significant reforms to the tax system, raising the minimum wage and strengthening unions. "It was so, so close, and the legislation really did embody the will of the bulk of people who really want lawmakers to solve some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Elite control is not about creating so much as preventing. It's easier to block than it is to make something meaningful happen, but the historical precedent is there. We know what that looks like." Collins is positive that there can be change, but said it would require continuous government action. "It may be quickly that the tide turns, and then it really is about maintaining a continuous public campaign to make progress on this profound imbalance we're living in," he said. "We can address this. It is addressable."