🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad outcry both within the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a national appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further review if he holds objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several European nations
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar debates in additional EU countries