🔗 Share this article

These individuals call themselves as the "emergency rescue team". Following their sudden termination when overseas aid underwent reductions earlier this year, a group of devoted professionals opted to establish their own emergency initiative.

Declining to "remain in despair", a former economist, along with similarly motivated past team members, initiated actions to save some of the crucial projects that were threatened with termination after the cuts.

Now, nearly eighty programmes have been rescued by a connector platform operated by the leader and other former team members, which has found them in excess of $110 million in recent backing. The collective behind the resource optimization project initiative projects it will benefit 40 million people, encompassing many infants and toddlers.

Following the agency closure, spending was frozen, numerous staff lost their jobs, and projects worldwide either stopped abruptly or were struggling toward what the leader calls "final deadlines".

The former staffer and several team members were reached out to by a philanthropic organization that "aimed to figure out how they could make the best use of their constrained funds".

They developed a list from the terminated programmes, pinpointing those "offering the most life-saving aid per dollar" and where a alternative supporter could realistically get involved and maintain operations.

They soon understood the need was broader than that original entity and started to reach out to other potential donors.

"We dubbed ourselves the emergency squad at the start," states the leader. "The organization has been sinking, and there are insufficient lifeboats for all initiatives to board, and so we're trying to literally protect as many infants as we can, secure spots for these support channels as possible, via the projects that are delivering aid."

The project, now operating as part of a global development thinktank, has obtained financial support for 79 projects on its roster in in excess of 30 countries. Three have had prior support restored. A number were unable to be rescued in time.

Funding has been provided by a combination of charitable organizations and private benefactors. Most prefer to stay unnamed.

"These donors originate from varied reasons and perspectives, but the common thread that we've heard from them is, 'People are shocked by what's unfolding. I truly desire to figure out a way to help,'" notes the leader.

"I think that there was an 'aha moment' for all of us as we began operating on this, that this created an chance to shift from the inactivity and despair, dwelling on the distress of everything that was happening around us, to having a constructive endeavor to fully engage with."

A specific initiative that has found support through the effort is work by the Alima to offer support such as nutritional rehabilitation, maternity services and essential immunizations for kids in Mali.

It is crucial to keep such programmes going, explains Rosenbaum, not only because resuming activities if they stopped would be hugely expensive but also because of how much confidence would be eroded in the war-torn regions if the alliance withdrew.

"Alima shared […] 'there is fear that if we withdraw, we may lose our place.'"

Initiatives with extended objectives, such as improving medical infrastructure, or in additional areas such as education, have not been part of Pro's work. It also does not seek to maintain initiatives permanently but to "create a window for the organizations and, truthfully, the wider community, to figure out a sustainable answer".

Now that they have obtained backing for every initiative on its first selection, Pro states it will now concentrate on assisting further populations with "proven, cost-effective interventions".